USPTO serial 79019183
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER FRESH IP PLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DR., SUITE 2000RESTON, VA 20190United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | GAUGE PARTS FOR TEXTILE MACHINES, NAMELY, [ TUFTING NEEDLES, ] LOOPERS, [ GRIPPERS, KNIVES, REED FINGERS, REED PLATES, HOOKS, HOOK MODULES, ] LOOPER MODULES, [ REED FINGER MODULES, KNIFE MODULES, TUFTING NEEDLE MODULES, NEEDLE BARS, LOOPER BARS AND KNIFE BARS; TUFTING MACHINE TOOLS, ACCESSORIES AND GOODS, NAMELY, LOOPER, CUT AND LOOP PILE, TUFTING KNIVES AND REED DENTS FOR USE IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY; MACHINE TOOLS AND ACCESSORIES FOR AXMINSTER WEAVING LOOMS, NAMELY, GRIPPERS, REEDS AND KNIFE BLOCKS FOR USE IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY; MACHINE TOOLS AND ACCESSORIES FOR FACE TO FACE WEAVING LOOMS, NAMELY, PLUSH KNIVES, SELF EDGE KNIVES, MACHINES PARTS IN THE NATURE OF GRINDING STONES FOR PLUSH KNIVES, MACHINE PARTS IN THE NATURE OF GRINDING STONE HOLDERS FOR PLUSH KNIVES, ALL FOR USE IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY; MACHINE TOOLS AND ACCESSORIES FOR CORDUROY CUTTING MACHINES, NAMELY, CUTTING KNIVES AND CUTTING GUIDES FOR USE IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TUFTING MACHINE TOOLS AND ACCESSORIES SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF TEXTILE MACHINES, NAMELY, VERDOL AGRAFES IN THE NATURE OF WEAVING LOOM JACQUARDS, SCISSORS AND VELVET KNIVES FOR USE IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | [ ON-LINE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, INFORMATION TRANSMISSION VIA ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION OF TEXT, DRAWINGS AND PICTURES ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |