Drawing for SYSTEM SCHALKE

USPTO serial 79019198

SYSTEM SCHALKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3378784Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYSTEM SCHALKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID S SAFRAN

DAVID S SAFRAN ROBERTS, MLOTKOWSKI & HOBBES PCPO BOX 10064MCLEAN, VA 22102-8064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Coke oven machines, namely coal charging machines, coke pusher machines, coke transfer machines, hot coke transportation machines, as far as included in this class; rail grinding machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
012Internal combustion locomotives, electric locomotives, storage battery locomotives, diesel locomotives, as far as included in this classSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 17, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 1, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 29, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 29, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 11, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 12, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 12, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 18, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 12, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 13, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 14, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 16, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Feb 16, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 7, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 12, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance