USPTO serial 79019223
THE GOLDBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373179Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE GOLDBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | badges of precious metal; jewelry, namely, amulets; pins being jewelry; bracelets; watch bands; wristwatches; ingots of precious metals; charms; brooches; busts of precious metal; precious metals, unwrought or semi-wrought; alloys of precious metal; figurines of precious metal; gold, unwrought or beaten; gold thread; necklaces; jewelry; jewelry chains; cuff links; tie clips; tie pins; works of art of precious metal; medals; medallions; coins; earrings; palladium and its alloys; platinum and its alloys; rings; key rings of precious metal; ornaments of precious metal; silver, unwrought or beaten; silver thread; silver ornaments; statues of precious metal; figurines of precious metal; watch chains | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 26, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 25, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |