Drawing for PRISMALIX

USPTO serial 79019357

PRISMALIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288296Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRISMALIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meyer A. Gross

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Apparatus for operatory lighting, namely, lighting apparatus in the nature of surgical lamps for use in operating theaters and lights for medical and diagnostic purposes, namely intra-oral dental light systems, intra-oral light systems, chemiluminescent light for use in endoscopic exams, heat lamps for medical use, medical examination lamps, quartz lamps and ultraviolet lamps for medical purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Mar 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 6, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 11, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 11, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 29, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance