USPTO serial 79019407
BERNARD MAGREZ COMPOSITEUR DE VINS RARES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3312734Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BERNARD MAGREZ COMPOSITEUR DE VINS RARES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-33600 PESSAC, FR
F-33600 PESSAC, FR
F-33600 PESSAC, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie B. Seyler
NOVAGRAAF FRANCE122, RUE EDOUARD VAILLANTF LEVALLOIS PERRET, 92593FRANCEGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines of guaranteed label of origin (AOC wines), excluding sparkling wines and champagnes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |