USPTO serial 79019433
RTX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3524292Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 28, 2008
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with RTX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
John A. Clifford MERCHANT & GOULD PCP.O. Box 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephone apparatus, namely, telephones, video telephones, IP telephones, cordless telephones and wireless telephones; network equipment, namely, computer hardware for wireless products; DECT Ethernet repeaters; headsets based on wireless technology, namely, for stationary and portable computers, televisions, radios, PDA (Personal Digital Assistants) and mobile phones; wireless telephone jacks for cable and satellite television; apparatus and instruments, namely, wireless phone jacks for use in connection with telephone conversations over the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |