Drawing for SWINGO

USPTO serial 79019437

SWINGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWINGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda S. Chan

LINDA S CHAN KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP575 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Self-propelled sweeping machines, namely self-propelled road sweeping machines and self-propelled street sweeping machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
May 14, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 13, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 13, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 1, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 24, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 24, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 24, 2007ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Jul 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2007CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY
Jun 1, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
May 31, 2007RCIIREQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 2, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jan 5, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 16, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance