USPTO serial 79019469
TERRAZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3369537Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TERRAZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPPO Box 8749Attn. Michele ClarkDenver, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metallic building materials, namely, building materials in the nature of boards, panels, flooring, decking boards, moldings, and trim made of derived timber and wood-plastic composite boards, panels, flooring, decking boards, moldings, and trim with the exception of façade wainscoting panels; non-metal wall wainscoting panels, non-metal ceiling wainscoting panels with the exception of façade wainscoting panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture and furniture parts, mirrors, picture frames; shelves for furniture and shelves for racks; shelving parts, namely non-metal front cover panels for kitchen furniture and refrigerating cabinets; packing cases in the nature of a container made of plastic; non-metal storage bins, non-metal containers for the transportation of goods; and non-metal pallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Combs and cleaning sponges; hair brushes; brush-making materials; and articles for cleaning purposes, namely steel wool | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Werzalit AG + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Werzalit GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Werzalit GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Werzalit GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TERRAZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |