USPTO serial 79019495
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Orginize IP AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
CH
Other trademarks owned by Orginize IP AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
Orginize IP AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
CH
Other trademarks owned by Orginize IP AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
Originize AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
CH
Other trademarks owned by Originize AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
Orginize IP AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
CH
Other trademarks owned by Orginize IP AG c/o Inco Consulting AG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
PATENT-UND MARKENANWäLTE VSP ZWäNGIWEG 7SCHMAUDER & PARTNER AG, CH-8038 ZüRICHSWITZERLAND| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric, electronic, optical, measuring, signaling and control apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic detecting machines for detecting counterfeit security or anti-piracy labels, stickers, packaging, chips, and chip cards; optical character recognition apparatus, optical filters and scanners, and encoded and non-encoded card, label and sticker equipment, namely, computer printers for printing encoded cards, labels and stickers, electronic card readers, and magnetic coded card readers, all of the above for protection against falsification of goods; machine-readable data media, namely, software for verification and tracking of original products and anti-counterfeit software; optical data media, namely, computer chips in the nature of read/write chips, and encoded labels and stickers to be used for logistic control, and for identification and detection of counterfeit products; electronically and optically encoded security labels for use in labeling of goods for counterfeit protection; encoded computer chips for identification of originals; encoded electronic chip cards for the identification of originals and magnetic cards | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Goods of paper and cardboard, not included in other classes, namely, non-encoded paper and cardboard stickers and labels, stamped and/or printed cards, namely, anti-counterfeit stickers, labels, and cards; printed labels and stickers bearing graphic representations in the nature of optical variable effects for protection against reproduction and falsification and for verification and tracking of original products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Consulting services for business management, in particular in connection with the design and production of systems for protection against falsification of goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |