Drawing for AGRORESIN

USPTO serial 79019550

AGRORESIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256594Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGRORESIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMA

DREW & NAPIER LLC20 RAFFLES PL# 17-00 OCEAN TWRSSINGAPORE, 048620

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Mixtures of resins with organic materials for use as intermediates or in further manufacture, namely semi-finished fibre resin composites from agricultural resources, semi-finished heat curable fibre resin composites from agricultural resources, and semi-finished fibre-resin composite materials; semi-finished fibres impregnated with synthetic resins for use in further manufacture; semi-processed natural resin for use in further manufactureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 9, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 8, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 8, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Sep 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 31, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 9, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance