Drawing for EDO CHA

USPTO serial 79019565

EDO CHA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDO CHA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tea, also including Japanese tea and green tea as hot or cold beverage; cocoa; sugar; rice, tapioca; sago; flour and wheat preparations; bread, pastry and confectionary; ices; honey, treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces (condiments); spices; ice; beverages made of Japanese and/or green teaACTIVE
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages; drinks included in this class containing Japanese and/or green tea (not predominating)ACTIVE
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 25, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance