USPTO serial 79019570
FLEXIMIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3453888Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FLEXIMIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter B. Bromaghim
Peter B. Bromaghim Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire Boulevard, 7th FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electronic controls, sold as a component of paint coating and paint color sprayers [, all aforesaid products not in the field of machines, apparatus and instruments for the treatment and processing of powders and powdery substances ]; pneumatic grease guns; industrial machine presses, namely, pneumatic, hydraulic and electric grease presses; * all aforesaid products for use in the field of lacquer-spraying and coating technology * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WiWa Wilhelm Wagner GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WiWa Wilhelm Wagner GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WiWa Wilhelm Wagner GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named FLEXIMIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |