Drawing for CHATEAU FLEUR CARDINALE

USPTO serial 79019591

CHATEAU FLEUR CARDINALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3251945Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CHATEAU FLEUR CARDINALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Solomon

Steven J. Solomon Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100CLEVELAND, OH 44113United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine of specified and guaranteed origin from the wine-making estate called exactly-- "Château Fleur Cardinale"ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 16, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 3, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 14, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 13, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 11, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 11, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 3, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 3, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 3, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance