Drawing for RESQTEC

USPTO serial 79019783

RESQTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESQTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, hoisting and lifting tools and machine tools; pneumatic, hydraulic, mechanical and electric tools and apparatus, namely, cutters, spreaders, rams, door openers, hand pumps and foot pumps, all used to extricate victims from vehicles or buildings; telescoping pneumatic support systems used for stabilization, shoring and strutting; pneumatic rescue lifting cushions use to lift vehicles or buildings; pneumatic closing equipment, namely, sealing plugs that expand to close pipesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Portable power units used for generating, conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity used to operate life-saving tools and equipmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Apparatus for lighting and ventilating purposes, namely, warning light bars and flood lights; extractor apparatus to expel smoke and harmful gases, namely, positive pressure ventilation fans used to extract smoke and pump in fresh air and negative pressure ventilation fans used to extract oxygenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 28, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 7, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 11, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 14, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 13, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 27, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 3, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 3, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 28, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 22, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 3, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance