Drawing for +39 PIÙTRENTANOVE

USPTO serial 79019943

+39 PIÙTRENTANOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3171771Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2006
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with +39 PIÙTRENTANOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael O. Sturm

Michael O. Sturm STURM & FIX LLP206 Sixth AvenueSuite 1213Des Moines, IA 50309-4076

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Boats and structural parts therefor; boat bumpers; boat chocks; boat cleats; boat fenders; boat hulls; boat rudders; boat tillers; sail boats; yachts; automobiles and structural parts therefor; bicycles; motorcycles and structural parts therefor; motorized scooters; non-motorized scooters; water scooters; boat rudders; rudder gear; sail boat mastsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 1, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 13, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 21, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 8, 2013INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 25, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 27, 2012ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED
Jan 25, 2012LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
Jan 25, 2012A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jan 25, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 15, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 26, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 25, 2011AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Aug 25, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2011AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Aug 25, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance