Drawing for TECHOME

USPTO serial 79019945

TECHOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Gas burners for domestic use; electric bread toasters; refrigerators; air conditioning installations, namely, fans; extractor hoods for kitchens; electric hair driers; cooking apparatus, namely, microwave ovens; electric kettlesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 20, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 13, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 13, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Dec 8, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 16, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 15, 2006OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Nov 15, 2006OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Nov 14, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Feb 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance