Drawing for YAKKA

USPTO serial 79019977

YAKKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3283190Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YAKKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl L. Chadwick

CHERYL L CHADWICK BIC CORPORATION500 BIC DRMILFORD, CT 06460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Apparatus for locomotion by water, namely boats, pleasure boats, sailboats, hovercraft, canoes, kayaks, kayak paddles, oarsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
028Gymnastic apparatus and sporting articles not included in other classes, namely sailboards, surf boards, water skis, body boards, masts for sailboards, harnesses for sailboards, covers especially designed for surf boardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 1, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
May 1, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 28, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 28, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 13, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Mar 27, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 14, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 12, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance