Drawing for RUBLEFF'KA

USPTO serial 79019978

RUBLEFF'KA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUBLEFF'KA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages; aperitifs, non-alcoholic; table waters; cocktails, non-alcoholic; lemonades; peanut milk (soft drink); isotonic beverages; whey beverages; fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic; milk of almonds (beverage); fruit nectars (non-alcoholic); orgeat; powders for effervescing beverages; sarsaparilla (soft drink); syrups for lemonades; syrups for beverages; tomato juice (beverage); cider (non-alcoholic); vegetable juices; preparations for making aerated water; preparations for making liqueurs; preparations for making mineral water; preparations for making beverages; must; grape must; malt wort; extracts of hops for making beerSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
033Alcoholic beverages (except beer); aperitifs; arak; brandy; wine; piquette; whisky; vodka; gin; digesters (liqueurs and spirits); cocktails; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits (beverages); distilled beverages; hydromel (mead); peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; cider; rice alcohol; alcoholic extracts; fruit extracts (alcoholic), alcoholic essencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 16, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 26, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Feb 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance