USPTO serial 79019979
SAHARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAHARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
KLAKA RECHTSANWÄLTE DELPSTRASSE 4M NCHEN FED REP, 81679GERMAN DEMOCRATICGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage trunks, suitcases, handbags, traveling bags, rucksacks, sport and leisure bags, purses, wallets; key cases, briefcases, toiletry cases sold empty; umbrellas; parasols | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Footwear; headwear; clothing, namely blouses, chemises, dresses, jackets, jeans, lingerie, coats, trousers, slacks, vests, shirts, shorts, skirts, stockings, sweaters, ties, underwear, pants, socks, jogging suits, pantsuits, suits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heinrich Deichmann-Schuhe GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Deichmann SE
- Other trademarks owned by Heinrich Deichmann-Schuhe GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SAHARA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |