USPTO serial 79019992
AVICENUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVICENUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |