USPTO serial 79020001
ROTHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ROTHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Owner
Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
Neunkirchen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC.2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Setting stands and pallets for the precast concrete industry, all goods made of metal or metal and plastic composite materials; drying stands, dried products supports, drying carriages, drying racks, all of the foregoing goods made of metal or metal and plastic composite materials for the ceramic industry; precision pallets, workpiece supports, stands, racks, housings, coverings, hoods, containers with lids for storing or covering, all of the foregoing goods made of metal or metal and plastic composite materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Electrical and electronic appliances for domestic and industrial use, namely floor, hard surfaces and textile washing, cleaning, scouring, polishing and waxing machines; multi-purpose vacuum cleaners, namely, wet and dry vacuum cleaner; appliances for applying liquids to floors, hard surfaces and textile surfaces, used in conjunction with wet/dry vacuum cleaners, namely spray extractors, high pressure washers, steam cleaners; centrifuges | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electrical and electronic appliances for domestic and industrial use, namely drying machines for floors and textile; and drying systems for tiles and ceramic parts consisting primarily of drying furnaces for ceramic castings such as bricks | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ Setting stands and pallets for precast concrete industry, all goods made of plastic and metal composite materials; drying stands, dried product supports, drying carriages, support racks, all of the foregoing goods made of plastic or plastic and metal composite materials for the ceramic industry; precision pallets, workpiece supports, stands, racks, housings, coverings, hoods, containers with lids for storing or coverings, all of the foregoing goods made of plastic or plastic and metal composite materials ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Thomas Metall- und Elektrowerke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ROTHO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |