Drawing for MATTONI KARLOVARSKÉ MINERÁLNÍ VODY

USPTO serial 79020003

MATTONI KARLOVARSKÉ MINERÁLNÍ VODY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4000427Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 26, 2011
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATTONI KARLOVARSKÉ MINERÁLNÍ VODY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucy B. Arant

Lucy B. Arant MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KRUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1625UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Mineral water, table water and flavored waterSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2022UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 27, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 27, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 3, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 15, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 15, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 2, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 2, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 26, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 10, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 20, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 6, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 5, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 5, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 5, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 1, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 30, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 29, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 10, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 6, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Dec 6, 2007LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION
Dec 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 4, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance