USPTO serial 79020006
SANOMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3318442Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SANOMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Roppel
Andrew Roppel Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn. Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | House mark for a full line of [ books, pamphlets, ] magazines, newspapers, [ manuals, and newsletters ] on a variety of topics | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | [ House mark for a full line of broadcasting services; house mark for a full line of telecommunications services, namely, providing multiple-user access to the Internet, electronic transmission of data and messages, VOIP services, on-line chat rooms and bulletin boards in the field of general interest ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | [ House mark for a full line of all of the following services; ] publication and distribution of [ books, pamphlets, ] magazines, newspapers, [ manuals, and newsletters ] on a variety of topics in electronic or printed form; publication and distribution of digital images; photographic reporting; news reporting services; news agency services, namely, gathering and dissemination of news; production of radio and television programs; entertainment services, namely, providing Web sites, radio programs, television programs, and other on-line multimedia materials, all in the fields of music, videos, films, photographs, games, and educational lectures; providing on-line reviews of movies, books, music and computer games; [ movie theatres; ] production and distribution of movies [ ; video and DVD rental services ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sanoma Oyj
- Other trademarks owned by SanomaWSOY Oyj
- Other trademarks owned by SanomaWSOY Oyj
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SANOMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |