USPTO serial 79020019
Serial No. 79020019
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3245101Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2007
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79020019?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PL-33 300 NOWY SACZ, PL
PL-33 300 NOWY SACZ, PL
PL-33 300 NOWY SACZ, PL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DR. MATTHIAS SCHOLL
DR MATTHIAS SCHOLL ESQ MAILING ADDRESS14781 MEMORIAL DR #1319HOUSTON, TX 77079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Beams not of metal; building material, namely, semi-worked woods; boards of wood; common sheet glass for building; construction elements not made of metal, namely, shores, supports, nonmetal exterior boards, nonmetal exterior panels; door casings, not of metal; door frames, not of metal; door jambs not of metal; door panels, not of metal; fire resisting wood; glass roofing tiles; glass tiles; laminated flat glass for building; non-metal building material, namely fascia, shutters, siding, and trim; non-metal decorative moldings and decorative trim for use in building construction; non-metal exterior building shutters; non-metal roof windows; non-metal roof window panels; non-metal roof window fittings, namely, window screens; non-metal shingles; non-metal skylights; non-metal window casements; non-metal window frames; non-metal window sills; non-metal windows; roofing boards of wood; safety glass for building purposes; window casements not of metal; window glass; window panes; wood joints; wood moldings; wood posts; wood siding; wood window frames | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Wooden fasteners, namely, bolts, nails, rivets, screws; wooden nuts; wood knobs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction and repair of buildings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FAKRO PP Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks owned by FAKRO PP Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks owned by FAKRO PP Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |