USPTO serial 79020031
R-LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373181Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R-LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cutting Edges Pty Limited; ACN 000 919 602
AU
Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Pty Limited; ACN 000 919 602
Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard R. Michaud
RICHARD R MICHAUD MICHAUD-DUFFY GROUP LLP306 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD STE 206MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal fittings, namely, metal pins, [ metal clamps, ] metal keys for locking systems, metal key shanks, metal nuts, [ metal bolts and sheet metal wear plates, ] all for earthmoving, excavating and mining equipment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ Earth moving machines and equipment in the nature of backhoes, compacting machines, graders, dozers, cable shovels, hydraulic shovels, excavators, loaders, scarifiers and scrappers; ] ground engaging teeth for the aforementioned earth moving machines and equipment; ground engaging points for the aforementioned earth moving machines and equipment; shrouds for tips, teeth, and points for the aforementioned earth moving machines and equipment; pins and locks as component parts to secure tips, teeth, points and shrouds to the aforementioned earth moving implements; lip shrouds, wing shrouds, heel shrouds and adaptor shrouds for protecting earth moving implements and attachments of the aforementioned earth moving machines and equipment; bucket lip shrouds; structural, repair and replacement parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Pty Limited; ACN 000 919 602
- Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edges Replacement Parts Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named R-LOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |