Drawing for LOOPY

USPTO serial 79020102

LOOPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOOPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair preparations for caring, cleaning, tinting, adorning, dyeing, bleaching, styling, fixing and perming; other hair and hair treatment products (cosmetics); hair lotions and shampoosSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
021Cosmetic apparatus (not stainless steel) included in this class, especially used for the application of hair dyes, sponges, brushes (except paint brushes)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Research in the field of hair careSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 16, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 10, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 8, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 11, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance