Drawing for TROLLEY WASH

USPTO serial 79020110

TROLLEY WASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMAS JR, RAY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROLLEY WASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pumps, in particular high-pressure units; high-pressure cleaners; cleaning installations, in particular for containers, tanks, vehicles and shopping trolleys; cleaning machines and apparatus; washing installations, in particular brush washing installations for vehicles and shopping trolleysSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 28, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 4, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance