USPTO serial 79020131
ICE TROPEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373182Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICE TROPEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Prepared wine-based cocktails | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |