Drawing for OMER

USPTO serial 79020226

OMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3280083Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2007
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with OMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METALLIC STAPLES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INDUSTRIAL USE, NAILS WITH AND WITHOUT HEADS, METAL BRADS, METAL FASTENERS, NAMELY, PINS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INDUSTRIAL USE; METAL SCREWS, METAL RIVETSACTIVE
007HAND-HELD, NOT HAND OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY, PNEUMATIC, MECHANIC AND ELECTRIC POWER NAILERS, PNEUMATIC, MECHANIC AND ELECTRIC POWER PINNERS, NAMELY, PIN GUNS, PNEUMATIC, MECHANIC AND ELECTRIC POWER STAPLERS NOT FOR OFFICE USE, PNEUMATIC, MECHANIC AND ELECTRIC POWER BRADDERS, NAMELY BRAD GUNSACTIVE
008HAND-OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY, NAILERS, PINNERS, NAMELY PIN GUNS, STAPLERS NOT FOR OFFICE USE AND BRADDERS, NAMELY, BRAD GUNSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 22, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 22, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 22, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 19, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 5, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 5, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jun 5, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 14, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 20, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 7, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 2, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 2, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance