Drawing for ECLISSE

USPTO serial 79020236

ECLISSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174363Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ECLISSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jaye G. Heybl

Jaye G. Heybl KOPPEL PATRICK HEYBL & PHILPOTT2815 Townsgate Rd., Suite 215Westlake Village, CA 91361-5827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Door frames and locksmiths' goods of metal for sliding doors and windows, namely, metal locks for doors and windows, metal window screens, metal window pulleys, metal window trim, door casings of metal, metal door bolts, door stops of metal, door jambs of metal, door panels of metal, metal door frames, metal door latches, metal doors, metal door knockers, metal sliding doors, metal door trim, metal runners for sliding doorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 5, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 6, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 17, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 23, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 6, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 20, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 11, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 11, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 11, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 2, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 4, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 2, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 16, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 2, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jul 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance