CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LUXELL

USPTO serial 79020246

LUXELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3265285Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2007
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LUXELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Heating and steam generating apparatus, namely, steam generators, steam heating apparatus; stoves, electric stoves, gas stoves, oil stoves; central heating boilers in the nature of furnace boilers; electrical boilers; heat exchangers; steam radiators for central heating in buildings, hot water heaters, radiators, heat pumps, electrical water boilers, solar collectors; evaporative air cooling units for domestic use; air conditioners, electric window fans; ventilators for domestic use; air conditioners for vehicles; air purifiers and their parts; electric and gas apparatus used for cooking and boiling, namely, electrical toasters, electrical bread toasters; electric grills, gas grills; electric deep fryers, electric cooking ovens; popcorn machines, namely, electric popcorn poppers; autoclaves, electric coffee and tea makers, electric kettles and replacement parts thereof; electric hair dryers, electric hot air hand dryersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2025CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 19, 2025CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 26, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2025CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 22, 2025CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 11, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 13, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 17, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 16, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 16, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 16, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 26, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance