USPTO serial 79020314
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
POLYMER PROCESSING RESEARCH; INSTITUTE LIMITED
Itabashi-ku; Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by POLYMER PROCESSING RESEARCH; INSTITUTE LIMITED
POLYMER PROCESSING RESEARCH; INSTITUTE LIMITED
Itabashi-ku; Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by POLYMER PROCESSING RESEARCH; INSTITUTE LIMITED
POLYMER PROCESSING RESEARCH; INSTITUTE LIMITED
Itabashi-ku; Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by POLYMER PROCESSING RESEARCH; INSTITUTE LIMITED
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK J JORDAN
FRANK J. JORDAN JORDAN AND HAMBURG LLP122 EAST 42ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 17, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |