Drawing for SOF

USPTO serial 79020314

SOF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3476726Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 2008
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANK J JORDAN

FRANK J. JORDAN JORDAN AND HAMBURG LLP122 EAST 42ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024non-woven textile fabricsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
028Sporting equipment, namely, golf clubs and tennis racketsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 17, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 17, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
May 17, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 17, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
May 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 13, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 8, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
May 17, 2007PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
May 17, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Mar 22, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Dec 14, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance