Drawing for DDRFORMULA

USPTO serial 79020352

DDRFORMULA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242648Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DDRFORMULA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joe McKinney Muncy

Joe McKinney Muncy Muncy, Geisler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato RoadSuite 310Fairfax, VA 22033

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, x-ray apparatus for medical purposes and parts therefor; patient examination tables and patient treatment chairs for medical purposes, particularly for diagnostic purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 15, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 28, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 28, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 23, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 15, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 4, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 31, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jul 5, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 6, 2013PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Jun 5, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 13, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
May 13, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 17, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance