Drawing for FARIDAK

USPTO serial 79020373

FARIDAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194646Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
ISAACSON, GINNY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARIDAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III (Christine S. Beaman, M. Christopher Bolen, Kathryn M. Eyster, Jack B. Hicks, Sarah Anne Keefe, Fang Liu, Jeffrey R. McFadden, C. Robert Rhodes, Randel S. Springer, Maury M. Tepper, III, Mitchell A. Tuchman)

Maury M. Tepper, III (Christine S. Beaman, M. Chri Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of and prevention of disorders of the nervous system, the immune system, the cardio-vascular system, diabetes, metabolic diseases, the respiratory system, the musculo-skeletal system, the genitourinary system, for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, for use in dermatology, in oncology, in hematology, in transplantation, in ophthalmology, for use in the gastroenterological area and in the prevention and treatment of ocular disorders and diseases; pharmaceutical preparations for treating bacteria-based diseases; anti-infectives, anti-bacterials, antivirals, anti-biotics, anti-fungals, vaccinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 18, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 12, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 9, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 9, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance