USPTO serial 79020455
LENKELAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3268501Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LENKELAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH & Co KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH & Co KG
Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH &Co KG
Rengsdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH &Co KG
Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH & Co KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH & Co KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan J. Prepelka
Nathan J. Prepelka The Webb Law Firm420 Ft. Duquesne Blvd., Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICAL GOODS, NAMELY WOUND, BURN AND SURGICAL DRESSINGS, MEDICAL ADHESIVE TAPES AND ADHESIVE BANDAGES FOR HYGIENIC USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | ORTHOPEDIC DEVICES, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC SUPPORT BANDAGES; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY ELASTIC BANDAGES FOR ORTHOPEDIC AND HYGIENIC USE; ORTHOPEDIC SUPPORT BANDAGES CONTAINING ELASTIC; ELASTIC BINDINGS, NAMELY ORTHOPEDIC BRACES THAT MAY BE USED WHILE ENGAGING IN SPORTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH &Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher; International GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named LENKELAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |