USPTO serial 79020559
AIR TAHITI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIR TAHITI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing information in the field of telecommunications; communications via computer terminals; electronic display services, namely, electronic transmission of images via Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Air transport; travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for domestic transportation; travel agency services, namely, booking of accommodation, organization of day trips and sightseeing tours | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |