Drawing for DOUBLE BUNGAH

USPTO serial 79020571

DOUBLE BUNGAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233630Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
BROMAGHIM, PETER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE BUNGAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wayne A. Sivertson

Lightning Box Games Pty Limited118 Wyndham Street, AlexandriaNew South Wales, 2015AUSTRALIA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for instructing and manipulating features of games for gaming, slot and video machines; computer software, modules and components for games of chance or mixed chance and skill or pseudo skill; electronic systems in the nature of microprocessors for controlling the outcome of games; electronic systems, namely signalling devices and microprocessors for directly or indirectly linking gaming machines; video machines for gaming and video game machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
028Games and playthings, namely, electronic gaming and poker machines, slot machines for gaming; token operated slot machines, and electronically interconnected gaming and poker machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 12, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Aug 10, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 2, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance