Drawing for RELIABILITYINSTITUTE

USPTO serial 79020574

RELIABILITYINSTITUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELIABILITYINSTITUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH & GILCHRI255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications from web sites, namely newspapers, pamphlets, brochures, training manuals, handbooks, magazines, white papers, technical articles, in the field of lubrication of machinerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
016Newspapers; pamphlets, handbooks, training manuals, brochures, magazines, journals, newsletters, articles, posters in the field of lubrication of machinerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
041Education services, namely conducting lectures, seminars, workshops, training courses in the field of lubrication of machinery, providing educational training relating to the use, storage and dispensing of liquids and lubricants and providing online information thereto; providing educational training in the areas of improving plant and equipment reliability and providing online information thereto; providing educational training relating to vibration control in machines, mechanical apparatus and industrial plants; providing educational training in relation to the control and lubrication of machines, mechanical apparatus and relation to the control and lubrication of machines, mechanical apparatus and industrial plants; arranging and conducting educational conferences; publication of books, magazines, of journals, of newspapers, of periodicals, of catalogs, of brochures; electronic desktop publishing, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on electronic media, CD, DVD, on-line, featuring material and information pertinent to the field of lubrication of machinery; practical training in the field of lubrication of machinerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 13, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance