Drawing for IO-LINK

USPTO serial 79020605

IO-LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298195Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with IO-LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald S. Lombard, Esquire

Ronald S. Lombard, Esquire Law Office of Ronald S. Lombard4430 Twin Oaks DriveMURRYSVILLE, PA 15668UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic components, equipment and devices, in particular electric and electronic actuators and sensors, namely, inductive, capacitive and opto-electronic proximity sensor switches, rotary encoders, liquid flow sensors, temperature sensors and pressure sensors; [ electronic and optoelectronic evaluation apparatus for evaluation of the location and contour of a component during assembly processing and for vehicle automation applications; electric installations for the control of industrial operations, namely, electrical controllers for pallet tracking, component identification, part routing, error-proofing and assembly verification; ] data processing computer programs for the above mentioned goodsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 10, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 10, 2025CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Jul 18, 2025CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 18, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 5, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 5, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 23, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 23, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 21, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 27, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 27, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 23, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Sep 23, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 8, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance