Drawing for WRI

USPTO serial 79020612

WRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3324770Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with WRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra Epp Ryan

Sandra Epp Ryan Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.45 S. 7th St., Ste. 2700Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine parts, namely, anti-wear components for crushing machines, both with vertical and horizontal axis, namely, hammers, beaters; grinding mills, namely, ball mills, vertical mills and drag-stone millsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 9, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 9, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Mar 9, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Mar 9, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 27, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 19, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 7, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Nov 12, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 12, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 30, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 30, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 4, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance