USPTO serial 79020615
ERGO-T340
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3286529Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2007
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERGO-T340?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith W. Medansky
Keith W. Medansky DLA Piper LLP (US)P.O. Box 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laptop stands designed for holding a laptop computer | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bakker & Elkhuizen Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by OAHWIP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Bakker & Elkhuizen Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Bakker & Elkhuizen Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ERGO-T340
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |