Drawing for AIRCELLE

USPTO serial 79020708

AIRCELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3245118Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2007
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRCELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

Jeffrey H. Kaufman Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neust1940 Duke StreetALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motors of aircrafts; parts and spare parts for aircraft engines, namely engine nacelles, nacelle thrust reversers, air inlets, fan cowl doors, pylons and exhaust systemsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
012aircraft; structural parts for airplane cockpitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Repair and maintenance of air vehicles, namely, aeroplanes and aircraft; repair, maintenance and reconditioning of aircraft engines, jet engines and thrust reversers; [ construction, ] repair and maintenance of component parts of air vehicles including nacelles for engines, jet engines, propulsive units and thrust reversers; consultation in the field of maintaining, repairing and servicing air vehicles and their component parts, namely, nacelles for engines, jet engines, propulsive units and thrust reversers for air vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Assembly of component parts of air vehicles including nacelles for engines, jet engines, propulsive units and thrust reversersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Scientific, industrial and technical research in connection with air vehicles; research and development of new products in connection with air vehicles; mechanical engineering research in the aeronautical field; technology consultation and research in the field of aerospace engineering, namely, the modification of air vehicles and their component parts, namely, nacelles for engines, jet engines, propulsive units or thrust reversers for air vehicles; professional consultation in the field of aeronautics and aeronautical engineering services; materials testingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 16, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 22, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 6, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 14, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jun 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 22, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 7, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jan 7, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jan 4, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Nov 2, 2007RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 2, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 30, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance