USPTO serial 79020740
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
Joe McKinney Muncy Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | [Printing inks, security inks, namely, intaglio ink, alcohol soluble dyes, basic dyes, chemical proof paints, clear and pigmented coatings in the nature of paint, color pigments, colorants for use in the manufacture of printing ink, copying inks, printing pastes, namely,dry inks and metal foils and metal powders for painters, decorators, printers and artists, color pigments for use in a wide variety of graphic printing techniques; printing varnishes and lacquers; thermographic, printers' and dry ink preparations used to make security marks or to make visible and invisible markings as well as for coatings and compositions] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [Printing machines, matrices for use in printing and printing presses, namely, die set and template forms, namely, steel die sets, high tensile cast iron precision die sets and high precision metal stamped die sets, for use in printing and printing presses, printing plates, equipment for producing designs induced by magnetism in a composition of coatings containing magnetic particles, namely, machine parts, namely, roller bearings, magnetic apparatus used to create pre-defined magnetic fields which allow for the orientation of magnetic pigments in a wet ink film during printing, namely, machine parts,namely, gradient magnets] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [Electronic equipment or equipment operated electronically for producing, reading and for recording layers and markings or security marks created by printing or other means, namely, electronic, digital or electrically operated printers, electronic readers for detection of the components or composition of the layers and markings or security marks, scanners, equipment for recording markings which can be traced electromagnetically or magnetically, namely, magnetic reading heads] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [Printed matter, namely, blank or partially printed paper labels and/or bar code labels, paper, namely,acid resistant paper and/or adhesive note paper, banknotes, printed tickets, printed paper labels,adhesive backed stickers, printed documents in the financial, fiduciary and fiscal fields, namely,stamps, labels, banderols, business forms, credit cards without magnetic coding, security cards and identity cards, stationery, packaging materials, namely, paper envelopes, plastic bags, paper bags,paper boxes, cardboard boxes, envelopes, paper pouches and cardboard tubes and merchandise packaging in the nature of cardboard boxes, blister cards and plastic bubble packs for wrapping or packaging; plastic foils for wrapping and packaging] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [Treatment of materials, namely, printing, digital printing and marking, namely, applying security marks,markings, coatings and compositions for reading and encoding used for fighting counterfeiting, forgery and fraud; consulting with regard to printing, namely, professional consulting with others regarding imprinting of banknotes, security documents, fiduciary documents and credentials with security elements used for authentication and identification, namely, decorative markings and/or security elements in the nature of holograms and holographic security foils, as well as layers with colors which become visible depending on the viewing angle] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Security consulting, namely, professional consulting with others regarding the use of security elements,namely, decorative markings and/or security elements in the nature of holograms and holographic security foils, as well as layers with colors which become visible depending on the viewing angle, for the purpose of authenticating and identifying banknotes, security documents, fiduciary documents and credentials | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |