Drawing for LANCASTER TAN MAXIMIZER

USPTO serial 79020759

LANCASTER TAN MAXIMIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3401970Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 25, 2008
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LANCASTER TAN MAXIMIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, ] cosmetics [, ] [ cosmetic hair lotions ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 5, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 11, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 11, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 4, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 26, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 26, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 21, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 8, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 9, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 10, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 10, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Jul 10, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 2, 2013FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2013PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
May 28, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 6, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 10, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 1, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 16, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance