Drawing for ARCQUE

USPTO serial 79020771

ARCQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253906Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum; Charles S. Murray, Jr.

NEIL F GREENBLUM; CHARLES S MURRAY JR GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; Computer peripheral devices; Downloadable and recorded computer software for simulating and generating engineering designs; Downloadable and recorded computer software for analyzing data, the results of which are used to design, review, simulate and improve the quality and efficiency of software engineering strategies and computer hardware systems engineering strategiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Business management and organization consultancy; Computerized file management; Systematization of information into computer databases; Compilation of information into computer databases; Business appraisalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Quality control for others; Updating of computer software for others; Consultancy in the field of computer hardware and software, Design and development of computer software; Computer programming for others; Engineering; Research and development of new products for others; Technical research in the fields of software design, software engineering and computer hardware systems engineering; Services in the field of computer science namely optimization of quality engineering strategies and evaluation and improvement of software and system architectures; Product research; Technical consultation in the fields of software design, software engineering and computer hardware systems engineering; Scientific researchSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 7, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Sep 24, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 24, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 7, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 7, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 24, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 9, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance