Drawing for DEKOK

USPTO serial 79020793

DEKOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEKOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Coffee grinders other than hand-operated; crushing machines, namely, electric ice crushers, electric pepper mills; electric machines and apparatus for cleaning, namely, carpet cleaning machines, electric machines and apparatus for carpet shampooing, vacuum cleaners, electric floor polishing machines; grinding machines for grinding food; rammers machines, namely, trash compactors; dishwashers; sifting machines, namely, vibrating flour sifter; wahing machines for clothes; food drying machines; spin dryers for drying food; electromechanical food and beverage preparation machines for household purposes, namely, mixers, blenders, whisks, citrus press; vaccum cleaner bags and vacuum cleaner hosesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Apparatus for cooking, namely, cook tops; powered coffee roasters; water purifying apparatus and machines; drying apparatus and installations, namely, clothes drying machines for household use; electric fruit roasters; electric roasting spits; autoclaves, namely, electric pressure cookers; electric pressure cookers; electric coffee machines, namely, electric coffe makers; barbecues; electric heaters for baby bottles; furnaces, other than for experimental purposes; ovens, other than for experimental purposes; heating apparatus, namely, electric stoves; microwave ovens; commercial bakers's ovens; electric slow cookers; electric cooking utensils, namely, electric griddles; cooking appliances, namely, electric and gas grills; roasting apparatus, namely, electric roaster; water filtering units for domestic use; cooking apparatus and installations, namely, gas and electric cooking ovens; cooking rings, namely, burner elements for electric cook tops; plate warmers; electric appliances for yogurt; rotisseries; electric roasters; electric bread toasters; electric toasters; filter parts of household installations, namely, filter cartridges; electric coffee filters, namely electric coffee percolators; filters for drinking water; electric kettlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, hand-operated coffee grinders, hand-operated choopers for meat, fish, vegetables, greens, cheese, mushrooms, nuts, fruits, berries, hand-operated pepper mills, hand-operated grating machines for vegetables and cheese, hand-operated peeling machines for peeling fruits and vegetables, hand-operated cutting machines, namely, egg slicers, vegetable and fruit cutters, bread cutters, and bread cutting machines, hand-operated food processors, hand-operated grinders, non-electric kettles, spatulas, rolling pins, tongs, ladles, skimmers, potato mashers, crab tongs, garlic servers, bottle openers, can openers, canister sets, spice jars, salt and pepper sets, salad sets, glassware; porcelain and earthenware, namely, beverage ware, milk pitcher, coffee pots, teaports, plates, cups, butter dishes, sugar bowls, saucepans, baking dishes, canister sets, spice jars, salt and pepper sets, salad setsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 6, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 27, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 31, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 16, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance