Drawing for SULAKE

USPTO serial 79020809

SULAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3395038Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 11, 2008
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
—

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SULAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Computer and video game software; virtual reality game software; computer game software enabling users to play games with mobile phones; computer game software for communication devices; electronic game software for handheld and wireless electronic devices;interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Providing on-line chat rooms [, electronic bulletin boards and discussion forums ] for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; [ mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; ] not including broadcasting servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games [, providing a website site featuring musical videos, film clips, photographs and other entertainment-based multimedia materials and information; entertainment software production services ]ACTIVE—
042[ Design and development of computer hardware and software for others; licensing of industrial property, namely, licensing of intellectual property; provision of technical advice, consultancy and information regarding all of the aforesaid services ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 23, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 15, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 2, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 201871.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 23, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 25, 2014CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 14, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 14, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 14, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 11, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 7, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance