USPTO serial 79020813
AURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DK-1001 Copenhagen K, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON ET AL599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Flavourings based on essential oils for use in the production of foods and beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Food and beverage additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as flavoring, ingredient or filler, namely aromatic preparations for use in foods and beverages, flavorings for use in the production of foods and beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design for others related to the manufacture and use of flavorings for use in the production of foods and beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |