Drawing for SPIRAX SARCO

USPTO serial 79020876

SPIRAX SARCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3362617Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 1, 2008
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SPIRAX SARCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles G. Zug

Charles G. Zug NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 South College Street23rd Floor, IP DepartmentCHARLOTTE, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Custom construction, repair, installation, commissioning and maintenance of engineering systems, and fluid or steam control systems; consultancy and advisory services relating to custom construction, repair, installation, commissioning and maintenance of engineering systems, and fluid or steam control systemsACTIVE—
042Technological consultation in the field of engineering, and fluid and steam control technology; conducting surveys of industrial premises in the field of engineering and fluid and steam control technology; conducting of feasibility studies relating to engineering, and fluid and steam control; technology consultation and research in the field of engineering, and fluid and steam control; construction drafting, engineering, industrial design and mechanical research; inspection and certification of engineering systems; preparation of engineering survey reports relating to fluid or steam control systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 29, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 28, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 19, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 9, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 9, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 25, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 18, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance