Drawing for CLEARLAB

USPTO serial 79020956

CLEARLAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228121Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CLEARLAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irene Y. Lee

Irene Y. Lee Russ August & Kabat12424 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Contact lens care preparations in solution and tablet form for disinfecting, cleaning, wetting, cushioning, soaking, or rinsing contact lenses; liquid solutions which rewet, lubricate, rehydrate or relieve dryness in the eyes or contact lenses; eye moisturizers for medical use; ocular decongestants for medical use; and ocular ointments for medical use, which relieve irritations, relieve redness, relieve discomfort or sootheACTIVE
009Contact lensesACTIVE
035bringing together, for the benefit of others, contact lenses and related products, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from a general merchandise catalogue by mail order; on-line and phone-line ordering services for others in the field of contact lenses and related products; electronic retailing services in relation to the field of contact lenses via computerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 25, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 25, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 25, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Mar 29, 201771AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Mar 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 14, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 3, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 3, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 1, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2013PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Apr 30, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 10, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance